The Government has unveiled proposals to move the ownership and management of water infrastructure from local councils and into the hands of four water services agencies, split regionally.
Local Government Minister Nanaia Mahuta released the long-signalled “Three Waters” decisions today, saying the move on drinking water, wastewater and stormwater infrastructure would save ratepayers money.
It would also result in better, safer services, and help ensure that the expected $120 billion to $185b in investment over the next 30 years could be made.
Mahuta said the present model was “ineffective, inefficient, and not fit for purpose”.
“Underinvestment, including deferred maintenance and renewals expenditure, has left a legacy of impending costs and poor services for future generations.
“We have seen the effects of a system in crisis: fatalities from bacteria in drinking water, broken sewer pipes, poorly treated wastewater running into streams and rivers, no-swim notices at the beaches, regular boil-water notices, and lead contamination.”
Mahuta said a support package for councils would be announced in the next few weeks.
However, the plan is in for a rough ride. There are 67 councils which currently manage their own water infrastructure.
Northland and Auckland would be covered by the same agency, and on Tuesday Whangarei District Council has voted to opt out.
Mayor Sheryl Mai told the Northern Advocate there was concern about what it would mean for the local assets ratepayers had paid for, and the risk Northland would come second to Auckland under the model. It had decided to opt out until more details were known.
Modelling on the impact of the reforms on Whangārei shows that without the reforms, the cost of investment in water per household in Whangārei could rise from $1860 now to $4060 in 2051. It calculated that the reforms could shrink that cost to $800.
Mahuta has argued the changes are needed to ensure safe water standards, and address the estimated $120b – $185b investment that is needed on water infrastructure over the next 30 years.
“The data shows the case for change is compelling. Without these changes DIA modelling shows that even at the more conservative end of estimates, the average household bill for water services could be as high as $1900 to $9000 by 2051, which would be unaffordable for many communities,” Mahuta said.
“Under our proposal for four providers those figures range from $800 to $1640, saving households thousands of dollars.”
Modelling by the Water Industry Commission for Scotland has shown the future cost of investment on a per household basis will be significantly lower than if no reform was taken. It showed the current cost per household in Auckland is $1060 a year.With the reforms, it was predicted to drop to $800 a year. Without reforms, it would lift to $1910 a year by 2051.
How it would work:
The four agencies would cover different regions.
The first would cover Auckland and Northland – a population of 1.725 million people – most in Auckland.
The second would cover Waikato, Bay of Plenty, Taranaki, and northern Manawatū-Whanganui – a population of 800,000.
The third would cover eastern and southern parts of the North Island and the top of the South Island, including Hawke’s Bay, Horowhenua, Wellington, Nelson and Marlborough – a population of 955,000.
The fourth would cover the rest of the South Island.
The agencies will be publicly owned, with local authorities considered the “owners” on behalf of their communities. Steps would be taken to try to ensure the assets could not be privatised in the future, such as requiring a referendum before any such move.
A Regional Representative Group of local authority members and tangata whenua would vote on an independent panel to appoint the board members to govern each entity.
They would be required to consult communities before making decisions.
Mahuta said it would include statutory recognition of the Treaty of Waitangi and mana whenua would have equal rights with local authorities on the Regional Representative Groups.
Source: Read Full Article